This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

VegaRX1

It's been over two years since AMD last launched a high-end graphics menu that could compete in the upper echelons of the GPU market place. That gap is literally unprecedented in the modern era. Starting with the launch of the 3D Rage in Apr 1996, ATI/AMD accept consistently churned out a new GPU every 12 to eighteen months. Expectations for the visitor's new Vega GPUs accept been high, but reviews of the Vega 56 and Vega 64 aren't nearly as potent as Team Reddish fans volition have hoped for.

We've rounded up 3 reviews from Computer Shopper, PC Gamer, and Tech Report. Equally we've previously discussed, AMD is offering Vega in three configurations: The Vega 56 is $400 and intended to compete with the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070, the Vega 64 (air-cooled) volition face off against the GTX 1080, and the Vega 64 liquid cooled is expected to be six-8 percent faster than the air-cooled variant. AMD, however, isn't sampling whatsoever of the liquid libation GPUs, and then all of the reviews we've seen are of the air-cooled model. Pricing on the bundles and cards is shown below, and each of the liquid-cooled cards comes with coupons to defray the cost of other high-terminate peripherals.

RXVega

All of the reviews point in the same direction. AMD'south RX Vega 64 lags the GTX 1080 by 6-10 percent depending on your criterion choice, while the GTX 1070 and Vega 56 are at to the lowest degree more evenly matched. But in that location are problems hither. We tallied the benchmark figures from all three reviews, and the overall pattern is consistent: While at that place are definitely games where Vega takes the lead, the GTX 1080 beats the RX Vega 64 far more than often than it loses. Exactly how close they are varies depending on the resolution you care about and how strictly yous define a tie between Teams Green and Cerise. The RX Vega 56 is on far more solid ground and takes more tests from the GTX 1070 than information technology gives away.

BioShock Infinite is probably the strongest win for AMD and Vega, but it'southward also four years old. Graph past Calculator Shopper

Unfortunately, GPU comparisons aren't just about raw performance. Power consumption matters every bit well, and this is where the RX Vega family unit really falls downward. AMD has pushed Vega correct to the edge and the increase in power consumption is significant.

sixTDPload2

Tech Written report put Vega through its paces with multiple power-saving modes enabled. Even in peak efficiency way (Vega 56, Power Saver), the much slower card can't lucifer the GTX 1080'south power draw. Vega 64 in Turbo Fashion draws a whopping 176W of additional power compared with the GTX 1080.

We've got both the Vega 56 and Vega 64 in-firm and intend to review them, merely the overall flick hither isn't great. The RX Vega 56 is a solid match to the GTX 1070, simply at a significantly college ability consumption. The RX Vega 64 is a less-great match for the GTX 1080, and the implication here is that you'll need a liquid cooler bundle to match the 1080 in functioning cleanly beyond the board. Toss in the fact that no online retailer appears to have any Vegas in stock and the style cryptocurrency mining has warped the GPU market, and you've got a very power-hungry card that competes with, but does not outperform, GPUs that accept been on the market for 15 months.  DirectX 12 is not much help in this instance; Nvidia takes a number of DX12 titles from AMD.

It'southward possible that we'll see this situation ameliorate over the long term; AMD's competitive positioning with the HD 7970 family was significantly better post-launch than information technology was on launch 24-hour interval. Similarly, we may see future Vega products amend on this design and deliver a faster or more than power efficient product. But equally of this writing, Vega is better than naught (which is what AMD had) simply far from the knockout blow that AMD fans were hoping for. Threadripper and Ryzen, at least, remain an unqualified success.